resurrect the wooly mammoths
Why in the world would the CIA want to resurrect the wooly mammoths? We thought that the CIA collected information to keep our nation safe. We thought it’s like James Bond spy stuff in the movies. Who thought we would ever mention the CIA and wooly mammoths in the same sentence? That’s right, the CIA is helping to resurrect wooly mammoths. Didn’t any of these people watch Jurassic Park? The CIA never heard, “just because you can, doesn’t mean you should?” All involved need to watch the movie because it doesn’t end well for humans.
George Church and Ben Lamm founded the company that’s located in Dallas. They have a vision.
“To see the Woolly Mammoth thunder upon the tundra once again.”https://theintercept.com/2022/09/28/cia-extinction-woolly-mammoth-dna/
Paris Hilton and the CIA are among their investors. They want to use advanced genetic sequencing to bring back 2 extinct animals. The wooly mammoth and the Tasmanian tiger are on deck.
In-Q-Tel is a new investor in Colossal Biosciences. The CIA funds In-Q-Tel. In-Q-Tel is a non-profit that funds technology. Biotechnology and DNA sequencing are an interest of In-Q-Tel. Colossal has the interest in “playing God” and resurrecting these animals and In-Q-Tel’s interest is, can Colossal do it?
It is illegal to clone humans. There are ethical reasons. The CIA’s involvement is to set ethical standards. One would think that ethically, this can’t happen. Where will they stop? It is awesome to resurrect animals that are extinct. Humans are the cause of many of the extinctions. The question is whether they should. The habitats of these animals is gone and that’s why they are extinct. These animals would need a habitat that suits their specific needs. Nature evolves. Would these animals evolve and or adapt to life on Earth as it is now? What would be the consequence if they did?
If they bring back this Tasmanian tiger, what will be it’s habitat. Will this tiger, in turn, cause the extinction of other animals? Will the frozen tundra, the mammoths habitat, be able to supply enough food for it? Would mammoths eat all the food needed to feed the animals we have in the tundra now?
The government is focused on climate. The government, specifically, the liberals in the government, set themselves up to make a fortune off of climate. They preach that we are killing the animals on Earth. They are losing their habitat. Animals in cold or in glacial areas are running out of space and food. Less space, less glaciers, equal less food to support these animals, like the polar bears and the arctic fox. Globalists and climate people often use animals to push their agenda. Humans have a soft spot for wildlife. Are the climate people okay with adding a beast like the mammoths into the equation? Would that not throw off the balance of the animals already here? It would have to.
Will these scientists think they can contain these animals? Would they keep them in a controlled and captive environment instead of releasing them back to the wild? If they are in a controlled environment, like a zoo, is that ethical? We have too many animals in zoos now with the intent of keeping them from becoming extinct. Is that fair to these animals? We would be bringing them back to become an exhibit. How is that ethical?
a different company, Neuralink
Will they stop with mammoths and Tasmanian tigers or will this continue to dinosaurs?
“We could probably build Jurassic Park if we wanted to,” Hodak tweeted on Saturday. “Wouldn’t be genetically authentic dinosaurs but [shrugging emoji]. Maybe 15 years of breeding + engineering to get super exotic novel species.”
These scientists take DNA and cut some of it out and replace it. This really is like Jurassic Park. It is a great movie for any who haven’t seen it, you should. The question is no longer how, but when?
Colossal Biosciences would be the ones bringing these animals back to life. The CIA is funding them to see if this is possible. Considering the ethical conundrum, would it be better to stop this before they succeed? We are not ones to hold science back, normally. This level of science could destroy other life on Earth, including humans. These scientists concerned about the possibility and the consequence?
Joe Biden signed an executive order. The order was for prioritization of biomanufacturing and biotechnology. It is for the cooperation and collaboration of the international community. It is a way to make sure this scientific branch of research keeps with American values. That must be a joke, right?
Our government is not new to ethical science activity. Bush and Clinton experimented with biological weapons when an international treaty banned it. Obama had a fake Hep. B vaccine in Pakistan. This allowed for nonconsensual collection of DNA to find Bin Laden. That being said, our government needs to do things that may not be ethical to keep the U.S. safe. There are things that Americans do not need to know. This is not one of those things. They are not preventing danger or protecting Americans, they may create it.
In-Q-Tel has a board. This board chooses how money is invested. These board members sit on the boards of other companies. This raises ethical concerns. Almost half of In-Q-Tel’s board members sit on boards of the companies they invest. The amount of money In-Q-Tel invested in Colossal will not be known until the release of it’s financial investments, next year.
the co-founders of Colossal
Lamm was attending college when he created his first company. He was involved with mobile apps and AI.
Church, a geneticist that attended Harvard, created a dating app funded in part by Jeffrey Epstein. Church was interested in resurrecting extinct species. He wanted to resurrect the Neanderthal. Church would like to clone humans.
The science community isn’t quite all in on this science. Some say that it’s not possible. There are ethical issues surrounding Church and his beliefs. He sounds a little like Mary Shelly’s Dr. Waldman that created Frankenstein.
With all the horrors in the world right now, is this something our government needs to be involved in? Is this how you want government money spent? The scientific community says this isn’t possible. Let’s hope that it’s true and it’s not possible. If it’s impossible, it is a complete waste of money. Church seems like a mad scientist without morals. Whether possible or not, government money is helping to pay for it.
If our government was watching to see if this is possible, for ethical reasons, would they be funding it or monitoring it? Our government “watches” people, businesses, governments and etc. for many reasons, but they don’t invest in them. Investing in them leads us to assume they want in on it. It is hard to believe our government is involved for ethical reasons. Lately, our government doesn’t have much in the way of values and ethics.
Americans are hurting because of Biden and his Administration. Hurricane Ian caused massive damage that will cost unimaginable amounts of money. Our government mismanages money. Biden spends on ridiculous things, like resurrecting mammoths. The government could spend this money on something that could help Americans. This research could cause the destruction.